Summary
Competition in the prediction market sector is heating up, with Hyperliquid expanding into prediction markets through the HIP-4 proposal to directly challenge Polymarket, while Kalshi's daily fee income reached $5.69 million, surpassing Hyperliquid. Polymarket continues innovation with new features, but regulatory uncertainty rises as Spain bans both platforms.
Prediction Market Competitive Landscape Undergoes Transformation
Prediction markets are emerging as one of the most competitive sectors in the crypto industry in 2026. According to DeFiLlama data, traditional prediction market platform Kalshi generated $5.69 million in trading fee revenue over the past 24 hours, ranking third among all protocols and surpassing decentralized perpetual contract exchange Hyperliquid's $2.09 million by more than double.
DeFiLlama launched a fee and revenue dashboard for Kalshi on May 21, primarily tracking trading fees collected from users. This public transparency allows the market to see more clearly the commercial potential and competitive dynamics of the prediction market sector.
Meanwhile, crypto-native prediction market platform Polymarket continues to innovate. According to community users, Polymarket's deployer wallet has deployed multiple contracts, planning to launch parlay prediction features before the World Cup, requiring all matches to be predicted correctly. Additionally, Polymarket has added political event markets such as when Vance will leave office as VP, with the probability of departure within the year currently at 10%.
Strategic Significance of Hyperliquid's Entry into Prediction Markets
The most notable development is decentralized exchange Hyperliquid's formal expansion into the prediction market sector through the HIP-4 proposal. The proposal supports off-chain event contracts, directly targeting Polymarket's core business model.
Hyperliquid's entry carries significant strategic importance. As a platform that has already established strong liquidity and user base in perpetual contract trading, Hyperliquid possesses advantages in technical infrastructure, market maker networks, and user communities. Extending these advantages to prediction markets could significantly impact the existing landscape.
From a product design perspective, Hyperliquid's support for off-chain event contracts means it can cover various real-world events from sports competitions and political elections to macroeconomic indicators. This design closely resembles Polymarket's model, but Hyperliquid's decentralized infrastructure may provide additional advantages in transparency and censorship resistance.
For institutional users and professional traders, Hyperliquid's prediction markets may offer a more familiar trading interface and deeper liquidity. The platform has already attracted numerous professional market makers and quantitative teams, and these participants can seamlessly extend their strategies to the prediction market sector.
Business Model Differences and Controversies
The rapid growth of prediction markets has also sparked discussions about business models and user protection. Industry observers note that different platform designs may lead to different benefit distribution patterns.
Some commentators argue that Kalshi's design tends to favor institutional investors profiting from retail traders. As a regulated platform, Kalshi attracts significant institutional participation, with these players having advantages in information access, analytical capabilities, and capital scale. Retail investors may be at a disadvantage when trading against these professional players.
Regarding Polymarket, critics suggest its design may help insiders harvest retail traders. Due to the nature of prediction markets, participants with insider information or early access to news can establish positions before market pricing adjusts, thereby gaining excess returns. The anonymity and lower barriers to entry of crypto-native platforms may exacerbate this issue.
These controversies reflect fundamental challenges facing prediction markets as an emerging financial instrument: how to provide price discovery functionality while protecting ordinary participants' interests and preventing excessive exploitation of information asymmetry.
Rising Regulatory Pressure
As prediction markets' influence expands, regulatory pressure is also increasing. Spain has banned both Kalshi and Polymarket platforms, becoming the first European country to take clear restrictive measures against prediction markets.
This regulatory action reflects governments' concerns about potential risks in prediction markets. Prediction markets, particularly political prediction markets, may be viewed as disguised gambling or could potentially influence elections and political processes. Additionally, regulators worry that prediction markets could be used to manipulate public opinion or conduct insider trading.
For regulated platforms like Kalshi, while they have obtained CFTC Commodity Futures Trading Commission approval in the United States, they still face uncertainty in other jurisdictions. Polymarket, as a crypto-native platform, faces greater regulatory risk because its decentralized characteristics and anonymity may conflict with traditional financial regulatory frameworks.
Hyperliquid's entry timing coincides with rising regulatory uncertainty, presenting both challenges and opportunities. As a decentralized platform, Hyperliquid may be harder to regulate in some aspects but may also face stricter scrutiny as a result.
Technical Innovation and User Experience
Polymarket's introduction of parlay prediction features represents an innovative direction in prediction market product design. Parlay predictions require users to correctly predict all events in a series, greatly increasing difficulty but also offering higher potential returns. This design is similar to accumulator bets in traditional sports betting and can attract users seeking high-risk, high-reward opportunities.
From a technical perspective, parlay predictions require more complex contract design and settlement mechanisms. The multiple contracts deployed by Polymarket's deployer wallet indicate the platform is making technical preparations to support this new feature. Such product innovation may help Polymarket maintain a leading position in competition.
Hyperliquid's advantage lies in its mature trading infrastructure. The platform already supports high-frequency trading, complex order types, and deep liquidity pools. Applying these capabilities to prediction markets could provide a better trading experience, especially for professional traders.
Industry Outlook and Institutional Perspective
The rapid development of prediction markets holds significant importance for the entire crypto ecosystem. From a payment and settlement perspective, prediction markets are an important application scenario for stablecoins. Polymarket primarily uses USDC for settlement, while Kalshi, though a fiat platform, has proven the commercial viability of prediction markets.
For institutional participants, prediction markets provide new hedging tools and investment opportunities. For example, companies can use prediction markets to hedge policy risks or macroeconomic risks, while investors can express views on specific events through prediction markets.
From a custody and wallet perspective, the growth of prediction markets also brings new demands. Institutional participants need secure, compliant ways to manage assets used in prediction markets. Professional custody solutions can help institutions participate in prediction markets while meeting regulatory and risk management requirements.
The competitive dynamics in prediction markets extend beyond platform features to encompass liquidity provision, oracle reliability, and settlement efficiency. Institutional-grade infrastructure becomes particularly important as market volumes grow. Professional market participants require robust systems that can handle large position sizes, provide accurate real-time data feeds, and ensure timely settlement of complex multi-event contracts.
The integration of prediction markets with decentralized finance infrastructure also presents opportunities for innovation. Smart contract-based settlement mechanisms can reduce counterparty risk, while automated market makers can provide continuous liquidity even for niche events. However, these technical advantages must be balanced against regulatory compliance requirements, particularly for platforms serving institutional clients.
From a risk management perspective, prediction markets introduce unique challenges. Unlike traditional derivatives, prediction market outcomes depend on real-world events that may be subject to interpretation or dispute. Robust oracle systems and clear resolution mechanisms are essential to maintain market integrity. Platforms must also implement appropriate position limits and margin requirements to prevent excessive leverage and potential market manipulation.
The competition in the prediction market sector is just beginning. Kalshi's high revenue proves the authenticity of market demand, Polymarket's innovation demonstrates the possibilities of product iteration, and Hyperliquid's entry may reshape the competitive landscape. Driven by both regulatory uncertainty and technical innovation, prediction markets are evolving from niche applications to mainstream financial instruments, a process that will profoundly influence the future direction of the crypto industry.
As the sector matures, we can expect further consolidation and specialization. Some platforms may focus on specific event categories or geographic markets, while others pursue broader coverage. The ability to attract liquidity, maintain regulatory compliance, and provide superior user experience will determine long-term winners in this increasingly competitive space. For the broader crypto ecosystem, the success of prediction markets validates the potential of blockchain technology to create new financial primitives that serve real market needs beyond speculative trading.
Source: link